Connect
Hamdasti
  • Home
  • Our Work
    • The Fellowships >
      • Chitpur Local 2014 - 16
      • Chitpur Local 2017 - 18
      • Connecting Local 2019 - 20
    • Chitpur Craft Collective
    • Para Artscapes
  • Events
    • Art for (of and by) All July 25- 31
    • Past Events >
      • Stereoscopic Narratives - Sep 2018
      • Tales of Chitpur - The Chitpur Local Art Festival 2018
      • Chitpur Local PopUp @Sienna Store
      • Chitpur Revisited 4- September 1, 2017
      • Chitpur Revisited
      • Does Art Matter? with UNESCO
      • Chitpur (dis)Local, Mumbai
      • Chitpur Local @ Studio 21
      • Chitpur Local Festival, 2015
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Contact

Reflections on socially engaged arts practices

6/13/2019

 
​Over the past 5 years, we have been unpacking the idea of collaborative socially engaged practices through our work with communities in the Chitpur area of Kolkata. This work has helped us challenge our own perspectives on the role of art in society.
​
The first area of exploration has been the ‘why’- why do artistic practices need to be socially engaged, what affect can these practices have? Our work has helped us understand that when artists engage actively in society we can create a space for underrepresented narratives and in the process, change the existing narratives. We can also catalyze new interactions that shift existing hierarchies. We can change how people see their position and role in society. And enact possibilities of alternate futures.
Picture
As a part of the project "Our Unfamiliar Streets" by Ruchira Das and the students of Sri Bidya Niketan School the girls stepped out of their comfort zones to actively engaging with people in their neighbourhood and created a narrative about their neighbourhood from their own unique perspective.
The second area of exploration has been the ‘how’- what does a collaborative practice look like? To start with we have had to let go of preconceived notions about our collaborators- recognizing that individuals and groups occupy multiple identities, positions of power, and communities. We also have let go of preconceived notions about outcomes, and instead we have started our projects by first finding people in communities who find value in collaborating with us, and then identifying a shared purpose, or at least a congruent purpose.
​

Forming relationships, being conscious of power dynamics and sharing the power of representation are essential to a collaborative process. The role of the artist often becomes more about creating unusual encounters, unfamiliar interactions, and creating room for challenging and questioning the status quo.
​

We start by creating a framework that can then be owned and occupied in different ways by their collaborators. We find that different local collaborators want to play different roles- not everyone wants to participate in art making, so our projects create spaces for these different roles. We also create space for iterations and feedback, and distribute authorship, so collaborators can then perhaps take the projects forward in their own ways.
PictureAs a part of the project Jorabagan Encounters, Sumona Chakravarty created a game, and police officers and leaders like Assistant Commissioner Mr Alok Sanyal, took on the role of guides and storytellers, transforming their interactions with the public during the project.

​Written as a part of Sumona Chakravarty and Nilanjan Das's grant application to KHOJ International Artists Association

Framing a Grihalakshmi

10/1/2018

 
Reflections on the Chitpur Local Fellowship by Srota Dutta 
​Initially when 'Hamdasti' signaled me a ' go ahead' with my idea on photographs of prospective brides, I  was little hesitant. Hesitant because being a non artist, community based art was a completely new genre for me. Previously I worked as a journalist and research assistant. So had solid idea about framing critical question for individuals but getting involved in art practice was a new venture` altogether. Moreover only in recent times have people started to consider photograph as an art form. So other than its commercial value various interpretations and theories behind those pictures are now being discussed. Other than that, photographs are mechanical reproduction of reality. Therefore it involves technicalities. And to be frank I have little idea about it's technicalities.

My project required intimacy. It is more of a personal conversation with the subject (here the women) in the photographs. Along with the basic knowledge on photography, point of views from the other end of the spectrum (that is of photographers) was necessary as well. 
      
When I started to work on my project,  building a community of photographers and photographed seemed a distant reality . However constant workshops, sessions of brain storming, reading theoretical texts on photography and history gradually helped shaping issues to focus on.
 
I have some photos collected from different sources but those were not from Chitpur.  While going to that area and reaching out the local studios became a regular routine, collecting photographs and talking to women of that area on issues related to photographs of prospective brides became a major barrier. Finally a breakthrough came when I entered Paul Bari.
Picture
A talk show on 'photography and women' was organised. Issues like, criteria of womens' beauty in society,  responsibility of a photographer in conjuring the 'perfect bridability factor' and awoman's own voice in conforming to certain demands and their negotiations with the notion of beauty started to get focused.   I could sense the community feeling in sharing stories of humiliation, insecurity and moments of pride amongst women. In return it paved the way for the  second talk show. It was 'beauty of a prospective bride and photography'. Here, an old, seasoned and successful photographer of analog camera era, from this area shared  his  moment of pride in transforming an apparently dark skinned woman into a fair one and thus confirming her acceptability in marriage market. Likewise issues like fair skin, long hair, soft look, questions like why smiles without teeth in photographs were necessary were also raised. While Photographers fraternity emphasised on their responsibility in making women 'ready to get married' more acceptable, men and and women, analysing displayed photographs talked about qualities which made woman acceptable as grilakshmi. Undoubtedly, the word 'grihalakshmi' imposes certain condition  that shapes up their personality. Therefore we decided to organise a discussion personality of prospective brides and photography. In that talk show woman's personality as home maker and reflection of that through lenses set the markers of Grihalakshmi.  And photographs visually signifying those qualities enhanced the commercial value of a photographers.
Picture
​As I could see, throughout these talk shows and personal interactions men and women both shared their thoughts and ideas about women as whole and it helped building a kind of shard space where issues related to womens' body, marriage and current notion about womanhood came into being.  
​
These public and personal interactions helped constructing issues to harp on during festival. Meanwhile   I decided to use peepshow box as a medium to convey the crux of my search. Many people asked me why this particular medium. Here are the reasons
 
  1. Peep shows are now obsolete and it can tickle adrenalin of ever nostalgic Kolkattaiyas
  2. it has a voyeuristic element in it.
  3. It somewhat blurs the idea of private and public viewing    
Picture
Picture
During  two days festival 'Chitpurer Gappo' I saw how  photographs and my performance with peep show brought men and women from local and other localities, men and women from different socio-economic strata together for a moment form a community through their reactions.
 
Chitpur with its hustles and bustles, filth, narrow golis and sound had returned to its original form after two days of festival but it's effect could be seen in 'Stereoscopic narratives' when an assistant commissioner of police  who was a part of the project constructively criticised the endeavour and conversed about bisarjan with local resident from Chitpur. I could see how my apprehensions and thoughts about imaginative community of photographers and photographed was transformed into a larger context. I could sense the community feeling when I saw Hamdasti as a catalyst created a platform where Sunit Chatterji from C. Bros deeply engaged in exchanging business ideas with Amarnath Dawn form Dawn Bari at Beniatola Lane. It gave a me sense of assurance that Hamdasti would be successful in organising many other editions of Chitpur Local and thus building a bridge between local pockets and the larger city through art.     ​
Picture

Courtyard (Uthan/Dalan): Activities and Social Structure

9/28/2018

 
Reflections on the Chitpur Local Fellowship by Anuradha Pathak
​First of all, I would like to thank the team of Hamdasti for including my project, ‘Courtyard (Uthan/Dalan): Activities and Social Structure’ as part of Chitpur Local 2 and giving me full freedom to explore, enquire and carry out this community led art and social practice project at Chitpur area. I would also like to thank the house-owners and their families, the neighbourhood people, the students and all the facilitators without whom this project wouldn’t have shaped up the way it is now.

I have split my reflections into 3 sections, first I will address the notion of why I chose the courtyard houses of North Kolkata, which were the houses and what was the process my project, (I will try to be as brief as possible)… then I will speak about the culminating event “Courtyard: Re-imagined” which was part of the Chitpur Local art festival held in February this year and lastly I will speak about the reflections in the form an exhibition, exhibited here at Max Mueller Bhavan.
Picture
Why Courtyard? 
According to the oxford dictionary the word “Courtyard”, is an unroofed area that is completely or partially enclosed by walls or buildings, typically forming a part of a castle or a large house but as an individual, courtyards have always secured a special place in my life as it carries memories from my childhood. I have stayed, grown up and even studied in courtyard houses/buildings not just in Kolkata but in different parts of Bengal.

Though as an individual the courtyard brings back memories but being an installation artist, I see it as a public-private space. A space where people congregate for an event or a meeting. A space where the public enters a private domain and the private meets the public in their own enclosed area but under the open sky.
Kolkata, as we all know has a distinct food & adda culture, way of living and a distinct architectural legacy which are an amalgamation of different styles and interests of people living in these houses.

While speaking about the living history of the past, one aspect which is distinctively visible are the old residential buildings in Kolkata. So, when I returned to this city about 5 years back, I started re-looking and re-discovering this city in a different way. I was gravitated towards the old architectural buildings, especially the residential one where people were still residing. For me, those build structure, some which were standing there for more than 150 years were treasure trove of various narratives. When you see a house, they are not mere roof over the head, but an outcome of the family’s needs, desire and re-lived memories. While doing the research, I was initially drawn towards two aspects of these residential houses - one, all housed joint family system and second, each of these buildings had ‘courtyard/s’ or the Uthan/Dalan as we call in Bengali.
​
Courtyards in every region of India has its own reason behind its presence but one distinct characteristic has been, the community public space in a private domain. This research project was an attempt to know, understand the past and present scenario and arrive at some inference as to what lies ahead of these courtyards and the families living there.
There are many courtyard houses in north Kolkata, finding them were easy but their involvement in the project was the toughest. Initially, few families like Rai Bari and Bagla house found the concept interesting but were quite reluctant to interact for long. I believe there was a ‘trust’ issue. There was a time when I had almost given up on the project but fortunately met one or two people who agreed to be the mediator between myself and the courtyard house-owners.
Finally, I worked with 4 courtyard houses, Mitra Bari in Darjipara, Sen Bari in Ahirtola, Dawn Bari in Dinarakhsit Lane near B.K. Pal crossing, and later briefly at Fanush Bari on Beadon Street (Bholanath Dham).

Mitra Bari in Darjipara, which is on Nilmoni Mitra Street and famous for hosting Durga puja are the decedents of Durga Charan Mitra, the court jeweller of Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah, which was later continued by Nilmoni Mitra but the family condition worsened with time. It was Nilmoni Mitra's grandson, Radhakrishna Mitra who brought back fortune in the family and started the Durga puja in the family in 1807. In recent times the Durga puja is organised and maintained by the daughters of the family. 
 
Sen Bari which is in one of the narrow lanes in Ahiritola, have a different social stature in the society. It house a joint family system which is quite a contrast to the rest of the houses I was studying. Their courtyards are much smaller compared to the rest of the three houses, which is called uthan in Bengali. Despite being smaller in size it is the most active courtyard. The courtyard is more of a private space, not quite open to the public unless invited.
 
Dawn Bari in Dina Rakhshit Lane, near B.K.Pal crossing is a business family. They had business of motor parts and owned various petrol pumps in this city. They came to Kolkata towards the end of 19th century and started building this present house around 1910 but none of the family members use to stay here as a result the house was in dilapidating condition. About 25 years back, Amarnath Dawn moved into this house and took charge of it and started renovating the space. 
 
Bholanath Dham (also known as Fanush Bari) is on Beadon Street. It is owned by the Dutta family. The house celebrates both durga and kali puja, it is during the kali puja the courtyard becomes quite active. The Dutta family has been flying Fanush from 1925 onwards and kept alive the Fanush making and flying culture since them. Hence the name, Fanush Bari.
Picture
Activities in the courtyard:
I have been interacting with all the families for more than a year, documenting their present-day activities in the courtyards and doing art interventions in some of the houses on regular intervals.
 
While documenting various activities in the courtyard, I learnt that apart from the different religious rituals during the pujas, nothing much was happening in any of the houses except in Sen Bari, where they use the space for household chores and regular interactions within the family take place.
 
Apart from interacting with the courtyard house-owners, I also started interacting with the people living in the surrounding areas of these house. My regular presence in the locality initially garnered curiosity but it soon got overruled when I started interacting with the family members of these people. I was soon invited to play carrom with the local people in the neighbourhood.
 
By now, it was more than a year of interaction with both courtyard house-owners and the neighbourhood people and was also the time for the Chitpur Local Arts Festival, which takes place towards the end of the program tenure.  For the festival, I decided to do the project event at the Dawn Bari, titled, ‘Courtyard: Re-imagined’. I selected the courtyard house not only for its location but also because it was an example of a well renovated house, carried out by one of its family members, who went against all odds to bring back the lost glory of the house. Though he has some restrictions in place, Amarnath Dawn keeps finding sustainable ways to maintain this house and retain its stature. The various interactions with the house owners and the neighbourhood people shaped my event structure for the Chitpur Local Arts Festival.
Picture
I planned 3 events one after another on 25th February 2018. It was designed to re-imagining and re-defining the courtyard, especially the outer courtyard of Dawn Bari.

The First event was, 'Carrom Board tournament' which started from 12 noon, a game which is fast depleting from the streets of Kolkata, especially North Kolkata. The concept was to bring the outside in.
 
Followed by a Mime act by Soma Das and her team. They performed ‘Anadarmahal er Katha' to bring the close door stories of the big Bengali joint families to the forefront. Introduction of Mime theatre in the event was also an experiment to realize how it gets played/accepted in an area where theatre practice is predominant.  It was also done to redefine the concept of a stage.
 
The final event was the releasing of the fanush.  
When you ask Ajoy Dutta, the main person behind the fanush making and flying, about sky lantern, he keeps clarifying that it’s not sky lantern but Fanush. Fanush comes in-between category of sky lantern and hot air balloon and they are release when there is day light. Fanush making and flying has reduced considerably with time, which was once a predominant practice in the houses of North Kolkata.
 
To revive and re-invent the fanush, a two-day fanush making workshop in the courtyard of Fanush Bari/Bholanath Dham, was arranged, a week before the final event. Students from St. Xaviers College, Government Art College, and few professionals participated. Some fanush were also released as a trial before the final event.
 
Making of Fanush is a tedious process and needs lots of patience, but the students learnt the technique in the two-day workshop and produced 9 fanush all by themselves. The fanush were released on the day of the event with the help of Ajoy Dutta and his assistants.
 
For me the project and the project event were a success as I could bring in the locals inside the courtyard as most of them were sceptical about entering the premises.
 
After the festival it was time to look back and reflect on my association with all the collaborator be it with the courtyard house-owners or the people from the neighbourhood. Though my association with both courtyard house-owners and the neighbourhood people continues, my desire to know their response and what do they plan to do next was profound.
 
It was interesting and wonderful to know that they are ready to open their space for such events where even the families can participate. Some are re-thinking ways to open up their courtyard houses. The demand for more documentation and compilation of courtyard houses in Kolkata was also put forward by the house-owners and they feel these courtyards are not going stay long and citing various reasons behind its disappearance. They also feel not just for historical value, it has its socio as well environmental value attached to it.

Picture

Iteration 1 of Srota Dutta's project with local women and photo studios

8/5/2017

 
As observed by Sumona Chakravarty
Picture
On a quiet Sunday evening, with grey clouds threatening to wash out all the preparations, Srota and her team were setting up an event at the Pal Bari in Beniatola Lane. The discussion planned for the evening, in the courtyard of the magnificent house, brought together 3 photographers from the locality (all male) and 2 local residents (women) to discuss their experiences of photographing and being photographed. 2 of the speakers were members of the Pal bari as well, as Pal Bari had a long history of photography.
The large matrimonial portraits of women that formed the backdrop of the stage set the context beautifully. Without articulating it directly Srota was able to bring out a clear gender lens in the discussion. Initially some of the participants had been reluctant to discuss the politics of matrimonial photography and wanted to more broadly speak about studio photography, however the backdrop and Srota carefully designed questions brought out the politics very strongly. This to me was the biggest success of the event. By the end of the evening a rapt audience got completely immersed in a discussion on the changing expectations on women as wives, evolving notions on marriage and the man’s role etc. Some asked that the discussion be taken to wider audiences and made more direct in terms of its messaging. How the discussion and the engagement of the speakers evolves over the next iterations will be exciting to experience.
I was also relieved to see how the event had brought together many of the neighbours- the empty seats half an hour into the event were soon full, the tea and bodas were flying off the counter! It was comforting to see how engaging local residents had helped us to reach out to their neighbours. Srota's attempts to widen and deepen her engagement with people in the neighbourhood had paid off!

A few complicated and a few simple things to keep in mind for the next iteration-
  • How can we build on the participation of the speakers and the Pal Bari? How do we balance the urge to reach new communities yet keep the project grounded by developing the existing relationships further?
  • How can we consider the interests and motivations of the participants while designing the event?
  • What do we hope are the outcomes? 
  • Signs need to be bigger.
  • Need envelopes for gifts.
  • Napkins and water are a must, along with Cha and snacks :)
Picture

Art in Public Space: A Critical Reimagining, Bangalore, 2017

7/12/2017

 
Art in Public Space: A Critical Reimagining took place in June in Bangalore, India. This four-day intensive lab was co-organised by Maraa and Primary, and brought together collectives from across India to share practice and take part in critical conversation around the politics of arts practice in public space. Here, Sumona Chakravarty from Hamdasti reflects on the gathering. 

While the workshop was titled ‘Art in Public Space’, the intent to rethink these words and imagining new ways of framing our practice was embedded in the impetus for this gathering from the start. As we listened to each other’s presentations over the first three days, there were as many points of departures as there were intersections across our practices. However to me there seemed to be a collective need to discard the notion that public space is central to our practice. In fact, by the end of the three days of presentations we gathered all the post-its generated by everyone and divided it into three categories – Practice, Publics and Public Space. It was proposed that we form groups and think through each of these larger themes, however funnily enough, nobody really wanted to think about public space as an entry point into framing our work.  It seemed too limiting and we needed a more layered, networked, interconnected framing.

In search of a more fitting starting point for our practice at Hamdasti, I substituted public space as an entry point with the idea of public moment. Looking back at the presentations from the other participants also reinforced this notion – it seemed to me that we were all in our own ways working to create a moment of publicness. Some by creating ritual space, or by realigning the relationship and movement of bodies in space, creating a new encounter, triggering friction, building a sensorial experience or a moment of play. These moments occur in public spaces but also in galleries, schools, homes workshops etc. For Hamdasti creating publicness translates to creating experiences where one can engage with the other and examine their relationship to a space in a new light. I strongly feel that its not so much our intent to place ourselves, our art or our practices (entity 1) in a public space (entity 2), but to work towards this publicness.
​
Just as we found that creating a distinction between art (entity 1) and public space (entity 2) was unhelpful, the distinction between an artist and publics seemed equally obsolete as a way of framing our work. Instead of the artist-audience, artist-community binaries, we tried to imagine new models, describing a network of relationships and hierarchies between the different people involved in a project. This allows us to acknowledge the power dynamics, shifting roles and contending interests. It also prevents the artist from absolving themselves of any relationship to the people who encounter or engage with their work and hopefully encourages us to think more intentionally of these relationships and our role with respect to this network. This system often has the artist at the centre, but also leaves room for imagining new ways of collaboration and exchange between multiple individuals or groups involved in a project. It also challenges us to think about taking on different roles at different points of the project, and acknowledge the relationship between different people in the network outside the artist-audience relationship. It also helps us think of who is missing or left out of this network.

This post was published originally on the blog on Primary's website

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Ruchira Das kickstarts her work with Bidya Niketan School

5/6/2017

 
As observed by Anuradha Pathak
Ruchira, the director of ThinkArts, works extensively with children, creating various kinds of performative events and experiences for the children of different age group through her own initiative. In her recent project with Hamdasti for the Chitpur Local -II, she is working closely with the students and teachers of Sri Bidya Niketan Girls High School. Her project started with making art as part of curriculum and generating a conversation amongst the girls and their grandmother and find out more about their surrounding and the bygone eras of their grandmothers. 

Initiating a dialogue with a community is to an extent still comfortably easy but continuing that aspect for long is a difficult task. Through various interactions with the students and their grandparents this barrier became more and more evident. She could speak to some students in groups from time to time but could not sustain a dialogue with the same  set of students, hence she planned her first intervention.    

29th April 2017 was her first intervention which was organized to bring the students and teachers under one roof, away from their school premise to make them think and experience their locality and about own family surroundings and generate a dialogue. The event was organized at the premise of the Chaitanya Library on Beadon Street in Sovabazar, Kolkata. Initially, doubts that the students won’t turn up at the venue did creep in when the schedule time for event was fleeting. Later, the students along with their teachers did come in numbers. Students from class V, VI, VII and even from Class X had come for the intervention.

The event started with the screening of Hamdasti’s film which was on various interventions, interactions and festivals that took place during Chitpur Local I. Since most of the screening was centered around the students of Oriental Seminary School it generated lot of interest amongst the girls as well as the teachers. 
Picture
Since this was an intervention to know their own surrounding, develop and know about their grandparents and be aware of their present situation, Ruchira placed 3 papers on the table. One had ‘neighbourhood’ written on it. Second one had ‘Amar Golpo’, meaning my story in Bengali and the third had ‘thakumar golpo, dadu r golpo & didimar golpo’, meaning grandmother and grandfather’s story. Each student was asked to take one colourful post it and write on them as a response to the title. I really like the approach to the whole concept. It was playful yet made them think. One more thing which was well-thought-out was the use of language for communication with the student which was Bengali, not only for verbal communication but even for the intervention. Since the students were well versed in Bengali than in any other language they opened up with ease and communicated profoundly.  Each student wrote about their interaction with their grandparents, observed and wrote about what was there in their neighbourhood and how they have changed and what personal story they had to share.  Later, even the teachers who had come for the intervention also participated.
Picture
​The intervention ended with filling up of a questionnaire where they were asked about how they envisioned their role in the project. In most of the responses, one aspiration was predominant and that was of taking on the role of an artist.  Later some of the teachers from Oriental Seminary School had also come and they also shared their experience with these students. 

The intervention ended on positive note that the students will continue to know more about their own locality and keep the dialogue with their grandparents going. The intervention was documented by the team Hamdasti and fellow artists involved in the project of Chitpur Local II.
Picture

Iteration 1 Suhasini Kejriwal and Bholanath Das' Project

5/5/2017

 
As observed by Dipyaman Kar
Picture
Suhasini Kajriwal’s presentation was the first public event of Chitpur local’s present edition. The event took place in the morning of 22nd April and continued for around two hours. It was apparently a simple performative act of pulling a specially designed (hand pulled) rickshaw from one place to another. The larger purposes were firstly to observe how ‘the object’ and ‘activities’ around it influenced the public and secondly, perhaps a critique of hierarchy and value of labor in the society. 
In this event, it was important to observe that how a previously conceived idea or a work of art transforms and generates unexpected situations/reactions, while exposed to the larger public and space. There was some kind of shift in expectations and planning that Suhasini clearly realized during the event, and addressed several times. In spite of all, the work was successful, because it activated the space quite well and attracted many people for interaction, and in this way fulfilled the core reasons of a public art event.    
A local shop owner, who makes printing blocks, stamps, signage, and one of the collaborators in Suhasini’s project, was commissioned to make three dimensional cutouts like (metal) words. A hand pulled rickshaw was decorated with the words that form a few lines of a poem written by Rabindranath Tagore. Finally the poem took a ride on the rickshaw through streets and lanes of the locality.
In the beginning the rickshaw was stationed in front of the Oriental Seminary School for public viewing and especially for school children who were passing by at that time. Many school students were interested and spoke to the team members, and then their reactions were thoroughly recorded.  Later, the rickshaw traveled through nearby streets and narrow lanes. It was pulled intermittently by the artist, sometimes by the curious people on the street and members of the Chitpur local team. 
The intention of this event was to attract attention of people for interaction with the artist and the members of the team, to give them an idea about artistic activities in public space, also to get their reactions. The responses we received were not enormous in number, but considerable and some extent pleasing. There was curiosity among the people and many came forward to interact or expressed their view. These conversations clearly indicated that how people think about the place, their consciousness about the poet (Rabindranath Tagore) and his association with the locality and understanding of the poem, which was on display. It was also observed that people had a strong sense of ownership and pride about the place. Many among others showed eagerness for more activities like this one in the area. The whole environment was encouraging, because everyone was busy on the streets, in the shops, but was extremely tolerant and curious about our activities and we faced no annoyance from anyone.         
There were also various suggestions we received from different individuals on how to make the rickshaw more attractive, interesting and visible.  These responses were equally important, because it gave the impression that some kinds of interactive elements, like the use of sound or distribution of printed flyers would have been more helpful to activate the space and to get more attention from people.  We also received some feedback from different people on the language of the poem. It was in Bengali but we realized Hindi and English translations were needed because of linguistic verity in the area. 
The event went on smoothly for a few hours and finally ended around midday in front of Chaitanya Library. The whole process of the event was documented photographically and in other format by Ranadeep, Varshita and Chayanika.
Picture

Starting Out- Video Collage 1

4/1/2017

 
The artists of Chitpur Local reflect on their first 4 months of engagement in the locality as they build community engagement and develop collective narratives. The video is the first of a series of collages which will track the progress of the projects over duration of Chitpur Local second edition, creating a common platform for reflection for the artists.
Camera and editing by Ranadeep Bhowmick

Chitpur Local Second Edition- Video Collage April 2017- Starting Out from Hamdasti on Vimeo.

The video is composed of footage from the initial engagements in the locality and artists' responses to the following questions-
  • Who are your collaborators, why did you approach them?
  • What do you see as your role as an artist in this collaboration? 
  • What are the principles you wish to follow when developing your engagement?
  • What are the expectations of your collaborators from you?

Kicking off the Second Edition- Some thoughts on the eve of the first workshop

3/1/2017

 
Tomorrow we are kicking off the second edition of Chitpur Local with a workshop facilitated by Christine Ithurbide of UNESCO, that brings together artists, curators and academics to design a framework for measuring the impact of the arts.
It will also be the first opportunity for all the artists who have joined us for this edition to explore how far they can push their projects in terms of community engagement.

Here goes... 


Our biggest moment of validation, came three years into the project, when we went to share the profits (meagre yet comforting) of the products we had designed with Diamond Library, and the two brothers asked us to keep the money so we could continue future projects in the neighbourhood.
But this still did not help us answer the question we asked ourselves each time we are stuck on the road on our commute to Chitpur, or even enjoying the thrill of people engaging with our projects on the street. Why are we doing this? Is there a point? Do you think we are making any impact? 

These questions have found answers in small ways.
Picture
The time when the students who were routinely chastised for their misdemeanour were praised for their leadership and contribution to the locality.
​

Picture
The time when someone discovered the value of their personal history and family profession.
​

Picture
The time when people from different backgrounds discussed something on display or played a game together.
​

Picture
The time when students planned and led their own projects on issues like road safety, local heritage and garbage collection.
The time when we were given credit for catalysing the creation of the school archive even though we did not work on it directly.
These instances, answered the question of impact in tinny, feeble voices, far from the resounding boom I was expecting at the end of three years of working in the locality.

I was hoping that by the end of three years, there would be an active neighbourhood group who would start their own pop up museum, or even do an annual photo exhibition. But there was no such group- don't get me wrong, there are many many people who will continue to participate, continue to join us each time we plan a new program, but the tools, methodologies and expertise are very much still in our hands.

This time around as we start the dialogue anew, envision new projects, what will be the answer we are hoping for. Does everyone even want to ask the dreaded “impact” question!!!

More information on the workshop below:

The Chitpur Local Festival

4/9/2015

 
Last month, our one year of work at Chitpur came together for a weekend celebration. Here is a quick recap!

The Two Day festival

Day 1 (Friday) began with a walk guided by Calcutta Walks Explorer Iftekar Ehsan, who made this unfamiliar neighbourhood suddenly accessible to a new audience, and people were excited to see what the next few days had in store for them.
The event officially started with an inauguration by the students, at the school, who wrote their memories of their school on a small yellow tag and tied it to the gate. The school was the starting point for the event and visitors received a map and a guidebook to help them navigate the other events across the locality. Each visitor and participant was given the same yellow tag and they were invited to share their memories in different spaces across the locality and start articulating their new found relationship to this unexplored para.
The first event was a talk by the Centre for Studies of Social Sciences on local cultures like Bottla printing, Swang, charak and music. There was also a parallel film screening running at the same time.
The talk was not really a success as even though we had tried to design it as a storytelling session and an adda, it became too academic and hard to relate to. The films were challenging for the context, addressing homosexuality and gender identities in Jatra, but were surprisingly well received by the students, teachers and visitors.
After these inaugural events we launched the public art festival and visitors dispersed to visit the key  projects i.e. the pop-up museum, the memory game and the Diamond Library project. Each of these projects triggered an exciting range of interactions- between participants, audiences and the spaces of the locality. People had many questions for the  pop up museum contributors, some had fun talking to students and playing the games they had devised, the students came up with new demands from a visitors, suddenly creating feedback forms and comments books and posters, strangers bonded over the memory game and were prompted to explore the neighbourhood after, residents who were sceptical came down and started taking pictures, some spent several minutes looking at the plaques in the school or the books and the diamond library, some made suggestions about how to make it bigger and better the next time around!
Day 2- The day began with another photowalk, with walkers finishing their journey at the school and the public projects located around it. The conversations and interactions continued with a steady stream of visitors all through the morning. The students refused to work in shifts and stayed behind all day, enjoying their responsibilities and acting as organized guides and facilitators. It was great seeing the diversity of visitors and the members from the local community who kept dropping by to see the projects.
In the evening, the activities intensified, a street performance, designed to reflect Jatra aesthetics started the program of events. To our complete surprise just moments before it was about to begin a huge RSS procession took over the road, which people dressed in costume just like our boys, extolling the virtues of our Hindu National Culture. We took advantage of the crowd that had gathered in the wake of this procession and launched into our own performance. The performance to visitors across the neighbourhood to the many sites of the project, and ended at the Chaitanya Library, a historic neighbourhood landmark, where we were hosting an evening of music from the Chitpur region. Film makers Debojit Mazumdar and Anindya Banerjee had also come to screen their films at the school, and the visitors could choose to attend any of the events, and then walk around the neighbourhood to interact with the different projects, meet local community members, learn more from the students and explore the many local shops.
At 10 pm, as the last audiences at the film screening left and the students reported back with success stories and the adventures of the day, we finally declared wrap up! Everything came down in a fraction of the time it had taken to set up!
Over the two days the event had over 500 guests, with extensive media coverage over three days and the highest engagement ever on our Facebook page.
<<Previous

    Hamdasti

    We are a Kolkata based  non-profit dedicated to promoting civic engagement through participatory art projects.

    Archives

    June 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    April 2015
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Artist Residency
    Brainstorming
    Chitpur Road
    Culture
    Heritage
    Kolkata
    Oriental Seminary
    Projects
    Rabindranath Tagore
    Studio 21
    Workshops

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.